Tag Archives: technology

Social security numbers too social, not secure

Pax Arcana

sscardLast week the Internet shark that processes my student loans changed its online payment provider, requiring me to create a new account on some other Web site for some goddamn reason. Of course the thing asked me for my User ID and Password first — things which I didn’t actually have since the site is brand new.

So I click on the Forgot User ID or Password? button to have the site email me my login information.

Two minutes later I find out that my default password is a random smattering of numbers (yay student loan company!) but my default User ID is my social security number (boooooooooo student loan company!).

SSNs are notoriously bad security devices. They are easily stolen since every American has been forced to hand that information over to credit card companies, DMVs, hospitals, universities, employers, and many other institutions typically run by idiots.

And if the Washington Post is to be believed, that’s not even the worst of it. Turns out that a reasonably sophisticated software program could actually GUESS your social security number based only on your date and place of birth:

The Social Security number’s first three digits — called the “area number” — is issued according to the Zip code of the mailing address provided in the application form. The fourth and fifth digits — known as the “group number” — transition slowly, and often remain constant over several years for a given region. The last four digits are assigned sequentially.

As a result, SSNs assigned in the same state to applicants born on consecutive days are likely to contain the same first four or five digits, particularly in states with smaller populations and rates of birth.

Using only birth-related information in the so-called Death Master File, researchers at Carnegie Mellon were able to guess the first five digits of the SSN for 44% of dead people born after 1988 on the first try. They were able to guess all nine SSN digits for the same group 8.5% of the time in less than 1,000 attempts — an effort that would take only fractions of a second using a software program.

Most thieves wouldn’t even have to get all nine, since the only digits unique to you are passed around like blame at a congressional hearing:

Linda Foley, founder of the Identity Theft Resource Center, a San Diego based nonprofit, cited another potential problem. She said many businesses have errantly rely upon or have moved to redact all but the last four digits of a person’s SSN, the very digits that are most unique to an individual.

“Because of the way the SSN has been designed, asking for the last four numbers of the SSN puts people at risk because those are the only numbers that are unique to you and cannot be guessed easily by someone who might want to use your identity,” Foley said.

The Carnegie Mellon research has some — including the Social Security Administration — calling for private business to stop using the number as an authentication number. Companies resist this because it will cost money — plus consumers don’t want to have to remember dozens of totally random numbers for each bank or other account. I think the answer is to let people create their own authentication numbers in whatever sequence or language they like and then use that everywhere. Mine would be “serendipity” only the e’s would be made of dolphins and there would be a rainbow from the s to the y. Just like my lower back tattoo.

Researchers: Social Security Numbers Can Be Guessed [Washington Post]

Leave a comment

Filed under science

Pete Hoekstra tweets his own demise

Pax Arcana

hoekstraDespite a massive uptick in users over the past few months, Twitter has done very little to enhance our ability to make fun of retarded politicians from flyover states.

That all changed yesterday, when Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) used the digital communications tool to spell out for the world what a tool he is when it comes to digital communications:

Iranian twitter activity similar to what we did in House last year when Republicans were shut down in the House.

When a politician says something that stupid in front of a live audience, the gaffe generally dies quietly. When he says it in front of a camera, it becomes a soundbyte for the next 24 hours.

When he posts it to Twitter, it inspires a glorious revolution of snark and hilarity. Witness the carnage:

lunayapravda @petehoekstra My mp3 player froze this morning and wouldn’t reboot.  Now I know what the Germans felt like invading Russia in winter.

rebeccarose2004 @petehoekstra  Climbed up in my attic this morning to put away a box.  I think I’m going to publish diary of ordeal, just like Anne Frank.

ImagistTD @petehoekstra I stubbed my toe this morning.  Now I know what it feels like to have your leg amputated.

LawrenceH @petehoekstra I just sent you a twitter reply which is similar to Tolstoy writing War and Peace.

will_watson @petehoekstra: One time, I waded a few steps into the ocean and ran back real fast. Now I know what it was like to storm Normandy.

paganmist @petehoekstra Had to move all my stuff to a new office w/o a corner view. Now i know what the Trail of Tears was like

brianicoleman @petehoekstra  i had to reach into the oven to get my pizza out for lunch.  now i know what the holocaust must have been like.

RevCyn @petehoekstra – When I got to McDonald’s I found my coupon for fries had expired.  It was like the great Irish potato famine.

TahirDuckett “@petehoekstra ran through sprinklers this morning, claimed solidarity w/victims of Hurricane Katrina

stryder619 @petehoekstra I sat in a meeting as work today. Reminded me of Slavery

blanket Hey @petehoekstra The neighbor kid threw his frisbee at my window. It felt like 9/11 all over again.

darathedamned petehoekstra I was out of pomegranate yogurt this morning. Now I know how Donner party felt

jamestimmer @petehoekstra I saw two spiders in the shower this morning. I felt like I was at the Alamo.

They don’t even have to make sense to be funny! Hahaha moron learn the innernet.

2 Comments

Filed under technology

Virginia Heffernan may be retarded

Pax Arcana

apple_iphoneDespite my affection for the light saber application, watching Arrested Development on planes, and the other 8 million fun things to play with on my iPhone — I really don’t care if other people find the thing as awesome as I do.

For example, I can see why people who have to type a lot — or edit Microsoft Office documents — would prefer the BlackBerry. Or the Pre. Whatthefuckever.

But Virginia Heffernan of the New York Times has taken criticism of the iPhone to a whole new level of awesome with her recent piece “I hate my iPhone.” Heffernan used to be the TV critic for the Times, but is now heading up The Medium — a blog/beat about the full spectrum of digital media consumption.

Clearly, she is up to the task.

Wait, that’s not right. Clearly she is not up to the task. That’s what I meant. Anyway, here is why she hates her iPhone:

I was late to get one — and maybe that’s the problem. Maybe my hopes for the iPhone curdled in the time it took for my perfectly good T-Mobile plan to expire so I could switch to balky AT&T and purchase one. But I had bided my time. And, really, my enthusiasm survived right up to the moment at the AT&T counter, post-sale, when a saleswoman transferred my address book from my battered BlackBerry to the sweetie-pie iPhone.

“Can you set up my e-mail too?” I asked. She handed me the phone and told me what to type. Pressing her good nature, I asked if she’d do that part too, since I wasn’t yet handy with the iPhone’s character-entry system — the 2D screen-based simulation of the qwerty keyboard.

She gave me a hard look. Truly, as if she was supposed to be on the lookout for people like me. “It’s your phone,” she replied briskly. “It’s time you started typing on it.”

I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking that this person — hired by the New York Times to produce high-minded analysis about how the digital age informs modern life — should not have to devote the 30 seconds necessary to learn how to operate the devices that deliver that media. That kind of work is for counter folk.

And you’re right.

In fact, I can sympathize with Ms. Heffernan. The last time I bought a car, the salesperson refused to drive me home in it. Then there was that time I went to see Memento and the usher refused to sit next to me and explain what was happening. Or that time I went to clear the snow off the sidewalk and the shovel just sat there like it expected me to do all the work.

I hate my shovel!

I hate my iPhone [NYT]

1 Comment

Filed under technology

Weed-powered airplane about to get high

Pax Arcana

planeYou may remember when we posted about jatropha, the wild growing weed that some energy scientists say is a good bet for mass-production of a reliable biofuel.

OK, you probably don’t remember that at all. Hell, I didn’t remember it until I did a Google search for “jatropha” and this Web site was listed among the results. There it  was — a whole post about the freaky weed with my name on it — and still I don’t remember writing it.

I guess an addiction to huffing spray paint really is a bad thing.

Anyway, according to the Tech Review, a Boeing 747 owned by Air New Zealand is set to be the first aircraft to test the new fuel. The first flight is set for December 3.

While other planes have flown on biofuels before, jatropha offers several advantages over other sources:

Unlike many other biofuels, UOP’s jatropha jet fuel can replace conventional fuel without requiring changes to existing engines. Indeed, by several measures, the fuel is better than conventional jet fuel. It has a lower freezing point and can be exposed to higher temperatures onboard a plane without degrading. It also contains slightly more energy than conventional jet fuel, so a plane powered by jatropha could travel farther.

Also, jatropha plants are inedible — which is good for farmers worried about the government subsidizing competition — and scrub the atmosphere of carbon dioxide.

Also, you can put your weeeeed in it. OK I guess that doesn’t make any sense.

A Weed-Powered Passenger Jet [Tech Review]

Leave a comment

Filed under science

Broadway shows are about to get even more annoying

Pax Arcana

As a certified member of the print media, I get all sorts of crazy whackjob press releases in my inbox every morning. Whether you’re selling apple coring machines or door-to-door pet grooming services, chances are that cut-rate PR firm you hired has spammed me with sloppily written missives on your behalf.

Here’s something I learned from these things — the only thing worse than Scientologists are anti-Scientologists.

wireless_spectrumHere’s something else — the hilariously named American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada (AFM) is pissed that the FCC decided to allow broadband Internet transmissions across the so-called “white space.”

The FCC says the use of the white space — which are basically the empty channels on the television spectrum — promotes broadband competition. But the AFM says unlicensed broadband devices may interfere with wireless microphones, thereby disrupting symphony concerts, church services, and musicals that depend on them.

In other words, when you take the family to see the Cats revival at the local playhouse, that audio you hear may just be errant transmissions from someone watching this over and over:

Of course, government lackies say there’s nothing to worry about:

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, who pushed for the white-spaces proposal, said the vote will allow many kinds of new technology, including enhanced home broadband networks and intelligent peer-to-peer devices.

“Opening the white spaces will allow for the creation of a Wi-Fi on steroids,” he said. “It has the potential to improve wireless broadband connectivity and inspire an ever-widening array of new Internet-based products and services for consumers.”

Lord knows the only we’re missing out on these days is wireless connectivity.

Sent from my iPhone/BlackBerry/Treo/InternetShoe

US FCC Approves Rules Allowing White-space Devices [PC World]

Leave a comment

Filed under science

Is there nothing Google Earth cannot do?

Pax Arcana

Well here’s a bit of serendipidous news for you. Not only can Google Earth spot north-south facing bovines on the plains of Nebraska, but also it can win you a gold medal in the Olympics.

Cyclist Kristin Armstrong ventured to Beijing last December and rode the time trial course for her event wearing a GPS unit in order to track the course elevation metrics for training purposes. She then returned to the states and mapped the GPS data using several different technologies, including Google Earth. Then she went back to China and won the time trial in a stirring race that might have been on TV if not for NBC’s 4-hour block of Olympic Bouncing Sexy Asses.

On a Google blog, Armstrong describes how this process helped her train for the event:

I was then able to trace the entire course from the comfort of my home half a world away and find a similar route to train on back in Boise. This capability along with having the elevation profile proved invaluable in my preparation for my Gold Medal race. It was also very nice to be able to show family members and friends the course from the excellent satellite views presented by Google Earth.

By coincidence, last night I used Google Earth to show my friends and family where I trained to be an astronaut. The resolution wasn’t sharp enough to see all the details, but I know an abandoned refrigerator when I see one.

How Google Earth Helped Win a Gold Medal [TechCrunch]
From Google Maps to gold medal [Lat Long Blog]

Leave a comment

Filed under sports

You are paying more than NASA for your data

Pax Arcana

Sending and receiving text messages from your cell phone — or as Pax Arcana calls it, the “gossamer communicatron” — involves a complicated array of technologies.

First the signal is transmitted from your handheld device to a nearby television antenna, where it is sent into ether and converted into radio signals. Then a series of tree-shaped radio receivers convert the signals into morse code and pipe the dots and dashes through a complicated network of underground tubes called “The Internets.” Once the morse code is translated by a crew of protocol droids, gasoline-powered turbines push the messages in hermetically sealed envelopes to a storehouse dedicated to your recipient’s cell phone number. An operator then reads the message and types the text onto the recipients cell phone screen through some sort of inscrutable black magic called “satellite.”

Speaking of satellites, one British space scientist (via Boing Boing) says the cost of sending and receiving text messages is four times higher than NASA pays for digital transmissions from the Hubble telescope. Which is way the fuck out there in space.

Ready to be bored?

“The maximum size for a text message is 160 characters, which takes 140 bytes because there are only 7 bits per character in the text messaging system, and we assume the average price for a text message is 5p. There are 1,048,576 bytes in a megabyte, so that’s 1 million/140 = 7490 text messages to transmit one megabyte. At 5p each, that’s £374.49 per MB – or about 4.4 times more expensive than the ‘most pessimistic’ estimate for Hubble Space Telescope transmission costs.”

Of course there are infrastructure costs — switching stations, towers, mall kiosks — that cell phone companies have to pay for somehow. The Hubble got its money from John Q. Taxpayer.

Speaking of, how much did the Hubble cost anyway? Oh, here it is. $6 billion. That sounds like an awful lot of money, doesn’t it?

Not so, says this one guy:

NASA space science chief Ed Weiler is quick to put that seemingly huge number in perspective.

“Thats about $6 billion spread out over 30 years,” he said. “And that equates to about two cents a week per American taxpayer over that period of time.”

Two cents a week? That’s more than a dollar a year! Do you know how many text messages that buys?

SMS data rate is 4x more expensive than data from the Hubble [Boing Boing]

1 Comment

Filed under technology